Home
/
Our Insights
/
Article Detail
/
Home
/
Home
|
Login
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
BOOK CONSULTATION
SUBSCRIBE
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
You can share this article in the following networks2:
An Estate Agent’s claim for commission: A few remarks
14 January 2025 ,
Rudi Pitts
890
Estate agents play a pivotal role in property transactions. However, disputes regarding the payment of their commission frequently arises, particularly when delays or complications occur between the estate agent’s introduction of a buyer and the ultimate conclusion of a sale. Resolving such disputes often depends on whether the estate agent can prove that he was the “effective cause” of the transaction.
In pursuing a claim, the following must be alleged and proved by an estate agent:
Compliance with the provisions of the Property Practitioners Act, 22 of 2019 and more specifically relating to the required Fidelity Fund Certificate and indemnity insurance. An estate agent is not entitled to any remuneration or other payment in respect of or arising from the performance of any act relating to the business of an estate agency unless at the time of the performance of the act a valid Fidelity Fund Certificate had been issued to him.
A mandate to find a purchaser or seller.
Due performance of the mandate. The terms of the mandate will stipulate what due performance is. In the absence of special terms, due performance will involve the following:
An introduction by the agent of a purchaser to the seller;
Establishing that the purchaser was, when the contract was signed, willing and able to purchase the property;
Establishing that a valid contract of sale was concluded;
Establishing that the introduction was the effective cause of the contract. Consideration must be given whether there was a break in the chain of causation.
The commission payable. This depends on the terms of the mandate. If nothing was said, the agent may rely on an implied term to the effect that the commission was payable according to the generally accepted tariff – see Muller v Pam Snyman Eiendomskonsultante (Edms) Bpk 2000 4 All SA 412 (C), 2001 1 SA 313 (C). In terms of our common law, an estate agent mandated to find a buyer earns the commission payable in respect of that mandate only if, amongst others, he is the effective cause of the sale concluded between the seller and the purchaser.
This means the estate agent will only be entitled to payment of commission on a sale if his efforts were the “decisive factor”. In other words, the estates agent’s input must be the primary cause of the transaction.
Given the complexities of commission disputes, legal action against a party may be a calculated risk. Estate Agents must carefully document their involvement in transactions and maintain records of communication with buyers and sellers.
Contact our office for assistance and advice regarding your estate commission claims.
Previous
GUIDELINES FOR USING A FIREARM IN SELF-DEFENCE - UNDERSTANDING THE LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA
Next
Signed, sealed, (e)-delivered: digital leap for Land Registration System
Related Expertise:
Property Transfers
Share:
Talk to us
Get in touch with us to discuss how we can help you with your Property Transfer challenges
Get in touch
Related Insights
Fraudulent Debt Collectors: Spotting the red flags and protecting your rights
Reconsideration under Section 17(2)(f): still a safety net?
Navigating harassment in community schemes
Popular Insights
Is your business ready for the new Employment Equity rules?
An Estate Agent’s claim for commission: A few remarks
Fraudulent Debt Collectors: Spotting the red flags and protecting your rights
Recent Insights
Fraudulent Debt Collectors: Spotting the red flags and protecting your rights
Reconsideration under Section 17(2)(f): still a safety net?
Navigating harassment in community schemes
You can share this article in the following networks:
Offices
+27 44 874 1140
Back to top