Page 66 - Q&A.indd
P. 66

30 days had expired, did in fact establish a valid purchase agreement
            between the parties, and was therefore enforceable.

            In your particular situation is means that due to your acceptance of
            the mortgage quotation, and because no material provisions existed
            regarding the provision of proof thereof to the seller, you have complied
            with the suspensive condition and thereby established a valid purchase
            agreement. However we advise that you consult with an attorney to
            determine exactly whether you have indeed complied with the wording
            of the suspensive condition and, if need be, approach a court to halt the
            selling of the property to another buyer.

            Can I be held ransom with a rates clearance
            certificate for future municipal debts?

            June 2017

            “I’m in the process of selling my house. When I requested a
            property rates  clearance  certificate from my municipality
            they requested me to pay the estimated rates until the end
            of their financial year, which would be months after my house
            has been transferred to the new owner. Surely I can’t be held
            ransom for these future rates just because I need a rates
            clearance certificate?”
      Property  In short the answer according to a recent Supreme Court of Appeal

            case is “no,” you cannot be held liable for payment of the property
            rates for the entire financial year of the municipality when requesting a
            rates clearance certificate.
            In the case of Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality v Amber Mountain
            Investments 3 (Pty) Ltd the municipality  required  Amber Mountain
            Investments to pay rates from 1 July 2009 until the end of its financial
            year, which would be a few months after the date of the registration of
            the property transfer. Amber Mountain Investments paid the amount
            of R2 281 014.68 under protest in order to obtain the rates clearance
            certificate needed for lodgement  at the deeds office to register the
            transfer. However, they were not happy with the fact that they were
            accountable for R1 066 532.00 more than was actually due and took
            the municipality to court.

            The question the court had to consider was whether a property owner
            in the case of a sale of property, is liable to pay rates calculated until the
            end of the financial year of the municipality or until date of registration
            of the property transfer?




            60
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71