Page 92 - Q&A 2019/2020
P. 92

Can I ignore the notice of demand if delivered
            at the wrong address?

            Jaco van den Berg
            July 2019
            “I signed a personal guarantee for my company with a credit provider. The
            company has defaulted on payments and the credit provider now sent me
            a notice demanding payment under the guarantee. However, they sent it
            to the company office and not to my domicile address as contained in the
            guarantee agreement. Does this mean that the demand is not valid as it was
            not sent to the right address?”


            What you are referring to is typically termed a mode of delivery clause which
            stipulates where and by which form (fax, email, post, by hand etc.) parties may
            provide formal notices to each other to enforce aspects of their agreement.
            As a general  rule our law of  contract demands  specific  adherence  to  the
            provisions of an agreement, which includes adherence to the provisions of a
            mode of delivery clause contained in an agreement. However, to determine
            whether non-compliance with such a mode of delivery clause invalidates a
            demand sent  under a guarantee agreement, our Supreme Court of Appeal
            recently had to review the position in respect of such mode of delivery clauses.
            In the matter the court had to decide whether delivery of a notice of demand
            to a guarantor at an address other than the prescribed address in the mode
            of delivery clause contained in the contract, still constituted a valid demand.
            The court considered whether a mode of delivery clause in a contract should
            be interpreted strictly or prescriptively, or rather descriptively, meaning that the
            broader context should be considered and that it is not necessary for strict
            compliance.
            The Supreme Court of Appeal found that in the current matter the mode of
            delivery clause was descriptive in nature and that as the demand was made
            and received even though not exactly as per the provisions of the mode of
            delivery clause, the demand was still valid as there was effective presentation of   Litigation
            the demand to the guarantor.

            This does not mean that mode of delivery clauses can therefore be ignored as
            the facts of each situation will determine the validity or not of a notice given.
            However, where there was effective presentation and receipt, our courts have
            now found that despite a lack of strict compliance, a notice of demand may
            still be valid.
            In your situation therefore, it may be that there are grounds to argue that there
            was effective presentation of the demand despite non-adherence to the mode
            of delivery clause. Our advice  is to consult  your attorney  and obtain advice



                                                                        86
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97